Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Newsome v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
LaVita Newsome
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angel v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Micah Angel
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Williams v. USA et al
as 4:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
Roger Williams
Defendant:
USA and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Ashby Funeral Home Inc v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2022cv00656
Plaintiff:
Ashby Funeral Home Inc
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Paula McClendon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Marlow v. Biden et al
as 5:2022cv05093
Plaintiff:
Damean Marlow
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Department of the Treasury, The and Internal Revenue Service, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. USA et al
as 4:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Cindy Stafford
Defendant:
USA, Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
McCoy v. Department of Treasury et al
as 4:2021cv01099
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
Terry L McCoy
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locke v. Department of Treasury et al
as 3:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A Locke
Defendant:
Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USA et al
as 4:2021cv00377
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and USA
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
