Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Manetirony Clervrain v. USA, et al
as 22-11212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Clervrain et al v. United States Of America et al
as 0:2021cv62266
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Josette Jean Jacques, Paul Abel and others
Defendant:
United States Of America, American Bar Association, American Correctional Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Wilson v. Wabash Valley Correctional Fa, et al
as 18-2024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES G. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02544
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Demos v. The United States et al
as 3:2018cv00278
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
The United States, State of Washington, U.S. Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Demos v. The United States et al
as 5:2018cv11412
Plaintiff:
John Demos
Defendant:
The United States, The State of Washington, The U.S. Navy and others
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 8:2018cv01030
Plaintiff:
John R. Demos
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Washington, Federal Highway Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BITER V ICC
as 01-3063
Respondent:
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
RICHARD M. BITER, RICHARD M. BITER and RICHARD M. BITER
Becker, Daryl v. STB, et al
as 95-1481
Petitioner:
Daryl Becker
Terminated Party:
Interstate Commerce Commission
Respondent:
Surface Transportation Board and United States of America
Intervenor:
T&P Railway, Inc. and American Trails Association, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
