Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Intuit Inc. v. H&R Block, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Intuit Inc.
Defendant:
H&R Block, Inc., HRB Tax Group, Inc. and HRB Digital LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gonzalez v. Intuit Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv06377
Plaintiff:
Erin Gonzalez
Defendant:
Intuit Inc. and CSIdentity Corporation d/b/a IDNotify
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rodriguez v. Intuit Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv05053
Plaintiff:
Deborah Rodriguez
Defendant:
Intuit Inc. and The Employee Benefits Administrative Committee of the Intuit Inc. 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Strothers v. Intuit Inc
as 1:2023cv03011
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Strothers and Gabriel Strothers
Defendant:
Intuit Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moloney v. Intuit, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06351
Plaintiff:
Sarah Moloney
Defendant:
Intuit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 22-2121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., SAP AMERICA, INC. and others
Peter Pedersen v. Intuit, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Peter Pedersen
Defendant:
Intuit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
