Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hudson v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2023cv01792
Plaintiff:
Michael Hudson
Defendant:
Brendan Kennedy, Maryscott Greenwood, Christine St.Clare and others
Nominal Defendant:
Tilray Brands, Inc.
Williams v. MDC Partners Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04120
Defendant:
Irwin D. Simon, Charlene Barshefsky, Wade Oosterman and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams
Justice, II v. MDC PARTNERS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01430
Defendant:
CHARLENE BARSHEFSKY, IRWIN D SIMON, WADE OOSTERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
McKinnon v. MDC Partners Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02381
Defendant:
Irwin D. Simon, Charlene Barshefsky, Wade Oosterman and others
Plaintiff:
Luke McKinnon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Robert Wilhelm v. MDC Partners Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02219
Defendant:
Irwin D. Simon, Charlene Barshefsky, Wade Oosterman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Marques v. MDC Partners Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01137
Defendant:
Irwin D. Simon, Charlene Barshefsky, Wade Oosterman and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Marques
Waterman v. MDC Partner Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00210
Defendant:
Irwin D. Simon, Charlene Barshefsky, Midas Merger Sub 1 LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Wang v. MDC Partners Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01126
Defendant:
Irwin D. Simon, Charlene Barshefsky, Wade Oosterman and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
In Re The Hain Celestial Group
as 20-1517
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rosewood Funeral Home and Salamon Gimpel
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lynn, James Spadola and Bradley D. Flora, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Stephen J. Smith, Irwin D. Simon, John Carroll and others
Ferreiro v. Barnes & Noble Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06809
Defendant:
Irwin D. Simon, paul b Guenther, Barnes & Noble Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
frank ferreiro
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
mark D carleton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
