Cases 1 - 10 of 646
Smith v. Baca, et al.
as 24-7816
Defendant:
STEVE DANIELS, Substituted in for NDOC Director Doe (ECF No. 16) agent of Charles Daniels, CHARLES DANIELS, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Caseworker: Substituted by Edward Gibson (ECF No. 16) and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB SMITH
Morris v. Long, et al.
as 24-5995
Defendant:
MELISSA MITCHELL, named as "Mitchell", WILLIAM MILLER, Lieutenant, named as "Lt. Miller", ROMEO ARANAS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MORRIS
Hunter v. Henley, et al.
as 24-5760
Respondent:
ISIDRO BACA, JOHN HENLEY, substituted for Isidro Baca and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner:
LEO HUNTER
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Mulder v. Baca et al

as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Mulder
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Brannon, Beisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dante Pattison v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 23-15066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE HANALEI PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, ISIDRO BACA, Warden, PETERSON, Doctor; 32 - suggestion of death and others
Parkes v. State of Nevada et al

as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Parkes
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Douglas Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Hermanson v. Fernandies Frazier, et al
as 23-15009
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES E. HERMANSON
Respondent / Appellee:
FERNANDIES FRAZIER and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Respondent:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden
Kentrell Welch v. Isidro Baca, et al

as 22-17017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTRELL D. WELCH
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, LISA WALSH, BARTTLETT and others
Thomas Brunsen v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 22-16987
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BRUNSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, DR. MINEV, DR. NAUGHTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.