Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ismeta Kadribasic v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
as 21-14177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMETA KADRIBASIC
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART
NIKOVIC v. TARGET
as 2:2019cv18233
Defendant:
TARGET
Plaintiff:
ISMETA NIKOVIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Muratovic v. Saul
as 4:2019cv02290
Plaintiff:
ISMETA MURATOVIC
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pupic v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv01839
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Ismeta Pupic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Poland et al v. American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO et al
as 1:2011cv00343
Plaintiff:
Cathleen J Poland, Serigne Ndiaye, Derrick Davis, Sr and others
Defendant:
Americal Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO (National), Computer Science Corporation Applied Technologies, LLC and American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO (Local)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Cathleen J. Poland et al v. Computer Science Corporation Applied Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Cathleen J Poland , Serigne Ndiaye , Derrick Davis, Sr and others
Defendant:
Computer Science Corporation Applied Technologies, LLC, Michael W Laphen, American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
Agovic et al v. US Department of Justice et al
as 4:2007cv00576
Plaintiff:
Zinaida Agovic, Zinaida Agovic, Zinaida Agovic and others
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Service and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
