Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Samal v. Jacquez et al
as 2:2023cv00092
Petitioner:
Pradyumna Kumar Samal
Respondent:
I Jacquez, C Peters and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sierra v. Jacquez et al
as 2:2022cv01509
Petitioner:
Siegfred Sierra
Respondent:
I Jacquez, C Peters and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ashemuke v. Jacquez et al
as 2:2022cv01320
Petitioner:
Emmanual Ashemuke and Emmanuel Ashemuke
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cargill v. Jacquez
as 2:2022cv01288
Petitioner:
Quincetta Y Cargill
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cargill v. Jacquez
as 2:2022cv01159
Petitioner:
Quincetta Yvonne Cargill
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Jacquez
as 2:2022cv01031
Petitioner:
Nicole Estella Jones
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00900
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harris v. Jacquez
as 2:2022cv00899
Petitioner:
Ardela Denis Andrea Harris
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Frick v. Dy et al
as 2:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Christopher Frick and Christerfer A Frick
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Detention Center - SeaTac, Dy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wood
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Israel Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
