Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Guerrero-Melchor v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv01169
Petitioner:
Ivan Guerrero-Melchor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Melchor v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2009cv01062
Petitioner:
Ivan Guerrero Melchor
Respondent:
State of Washington, Attorney General of WA State, Norman K Maleng and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Ivan Guerrero-Melchor
as 08-10553
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
IVAN GUERRERO-MELCHOR, AKA Tony Barrera, AKA Milton Moreno, AKA Jose De La Pena, AKA Juan Jaramillo Chacon
USA v. Ivan Guerrero-Melchor
as 08-15938
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
IVAN GUERRERO-MELCHOR, AKA Tony Barrera, AKA Milton Moreno, AKA Jose De La Pena, AKA Juan Jaramillo Chacon
Guerrero-Melchor, et al v. USA
as 08-80018
Petitioner:
IVAN GUERRERO-MELCHOR, aka Tony Barrera; aka Milton Moreno; aka Jose De La Pena; aka Juan Jaramillo Chacon
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Guerrero-Melchor
as 08-10062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
IVAN GUERRERO-MELCHOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00073
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guerrero-Melchor v. Gilkey
as 2:2007cv01202
Petitioner:
Ivan Guerrero-Melchor
Respondent:
Charles Gilkey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guerrero-Melchor v. Seattle Police Department
as 2:2007cv00853
Plaintiff:
Ivan Guerrero-Melchor
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guerrero-Melchor v. Seattle Police Department
as 2:2007cv00910
Plaintiff:
Ivan Guerrero-Melchor
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
