Cases 1 - 10 of 440
COUNT US IN et al v. MORALES et al
as 1:2025cv00864
Plaintiff:
COUNT US IN, WOMEN4CHANGE INDIANA and JOSH MONTAGNE
Defendant:
DIEGO MORALES, PAUL OKESON, SUZANNAH W. OVERHOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Knox et al
as 3:2024cv00972
Defendant:
C. Anderson, Ana Dowdy, S. Eason and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Neal Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Bradley et al
as 3:2024cv01766
Defendant:
Sheila D. Britt, Esq., A. Lisa Pierotti, Esq., Courtney Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Uche Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adam Farney v. State of Florida, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-12805
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN, WARDEN, J. ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM C. FARNEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davies v. Wead et al
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Tobius Davies
Defendant:
S Wead, J Bradley and K Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Novo Nordisk Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Leta J. Bradley
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK US COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS INC., NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fletcher v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Novo Nordisk Inc. et al
as MSN/1:23-CV-00166
Plaintiff:
Bradley and Leta J. Bradley
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc, Novo Nordisk Inc., Novo Nordisk US Commercial Holdings Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
