Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rose v. Cox et al
as 1:2025cv00033
Plaintiff:
Carl Rose
Defendant:
J W Cox and FNU Delgado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. FCC Pollock Municipality et al
as 1:2024cv00916
Defendant:
Designation & Sentence Computation Center, D Lair, Acting Complex Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Janard Shamar Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lewis-Bey v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Carlos Devon Lewis-Bey and Carlos Devon Lewis
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lugman v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Abdul K Lugman
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Cox
as 1:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
Robert Ross Banks
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abebe v. Cox
as 1:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Unula Boo-Shawn Abebe
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Callery v. Cox
as 1:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Kevin Callery
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abebe v. Cox et al
as 3:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Unula Abebe
Respondent:
J. W. Cox and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
West v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-30353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald Joseph West, Individually and on behalf of J F W
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv05672
Plaintiff:
Christopher Moore
Defendant:
C Johnson, C McConnell, C Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
