Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Koklich v. Yates et al
as 1:2011at00561
Defendant:
James A. Yates, P. Mendoza, Mr. Chamness and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Koklich v. Yates et al
as 1:2011cv01507
Defendant:
James A. Yates, P. Mendoza, Chamness and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011at00554
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Clark J. Kelso, James A. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011at00503
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011cv01403
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Macho v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv03100
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Macho
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, J. Chudy, J. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forney v. State of California et al
as 5:2011cv02841
Plaintiff:
Jerold Desmond Forney
Defendant:
State of California, CTF State Prison Medical Department, Trent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Bratton v. Ben Curry, et al
as 11-16331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BRATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, E. KLEIN, A. JANNAH and others
Hanna v. Chudy et al
as 5:2011cv01492
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Hanna
Defendant:
J. Chudy, G. Ellis, C. Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 4:2011cv00868
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Mackson
Defendant:
Randy Grounds, K. J. Allen, D. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.