Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Bishs RV, LLC v. Coyle et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bishs RV, LLC
Defendant:
Michael J. Coyle and FreedomRoads, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stine v. Fragoso et al
as 4:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
R Fragoso, J Coyle, M Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stine v. Coyle et al
as 4:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
J Coyle, S Karlan, E Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mark Habelt, et al v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc., et al
as 22-15660
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK HABELT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant / Appellee:
IRHYTHM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., KEVIN M. KING, MICHAEL J. COYLE and others
Lancaster v. Pierce et al
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Defendant:
Unknown Pierce, Unknown Foukler, Unknown Peloski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Dukett et al
as 4:2019cv00422
Defendant:
J Karlan, Bureau of Prisons, J Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rarey v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lynn Rarey
Defendant:
United States of America, J Coyle and Ann Ash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ortiz-Feliciano v. Von Blanckensee et al
as 4:2019cv00005
Defendant:
Unknown Lonwer, B Von Blanckensee, G Merrel and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Ortiz-Feliciano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY et al v. COYLE
as 1:2018cv11237
Plaintiff:
REBECCA MURPHY and MARTIN JAMES MURPHY
Defendant:
JOHN J. COYLE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turi v. Gaffney et al
as 1:2016cv03320
Plaintiff:
Joseph Turi
Defendant:
Brian Gaffney, M Manojlovic, R Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
