Cases 1 - 10 of 332
GRIFFIN v. WADAS
as 2:2025cv00003
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Petitioner:
WILLIE J. GRIFFIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Schendorf v. Gomez, et al
as 24-1463
Defendant:
NATHANIEL NEIDIG, ATL HAMILTON, TOM THWAITS and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE P. SCHENDORF
Al Qadomi et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv01852
Plaintiff:
TOBACCO TOWN LLC d/b/a Puff City Bridgeport, TOBACCO TOWN LLC d/b/a Puff City Guilford, BROTHERS P.C. LLC d/b/a Puff City Milford and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, COMMISSIONER OF THE BRYAN CAFFERELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Griffin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01103
Plaintiff:
Melissa J Griffin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Billy Griffin v. United States
as 24-3193
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Billy J. Griffin
Griffin v. Bauby, et al
as 24-1299
Defendant:
AUGUST BAUBY and KIMBERLY MORA
Plaintiff:
RYAN J. GRIFFIN
Griffin v. Adams
as 3:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Cedric J Griffin
Defendant:
Donnie Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcher v. Pike County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Pike County Jail, Deputy Peter J. Griffin and Judge Unknown Conerly
Plaintiff:
Tracy Vondrake Wilcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc
as 1:2024cv02726
Respondent:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith Inc
Petitioner:
Nikita J. Griffin
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Application to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
