Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Joe A. Taylor-El et al v. Leanna Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv02611
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Taylor-El and Darrick L. Jones-Bey
Defendant:
Leanna Lundy, Erica Lake, J. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv30040
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 1:2023cv02710
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. David McKay
as 22-3363
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David J. McKay
Trim v. Delaney et al
as 3:2020cv00344
Defendant:
Trintee Williamson, Tim Delaney, J. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jenkins v. McKay et al
as 1:2020cv00118
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Jenkins
Defendant:
L. Stephens, J. McKay, B. Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchins v. City of Springfield, et al
as 19-1291
Defendant / Appellant:
SPRINGFIELD, MA, DANIEL J. MCKAY, THOMAS HERVIEUX and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEE HUTCHINS
Chouteau et al v. Golden Rule Insurance Company et al
as 1:2018cv00333
Plaintiff:
Curtis Chouteau and Taryn M. Chouteau
Defendant:
Golden Rule Insurance Company and Angela J. McKay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
McKay v. East Hartford Police Departmen
as 17-3266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rasheen J. McKay
Defendant - Appellee:
East Hartford Police Department, Scott M. Sansom, Robert Davis and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
