Cases 1 - 10 of 29
WADE v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00508
Petitioner:
RANDY J WADE
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
London v. Stiltner et al
as 7:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Larry Lynn London
Defendant:
S. Stiltner, Looney, J. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
London v. Stiltner et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Larry Lynn London
Defendant:
S. Stiltner, Looney, J. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niles v. Mattucello et al
as 1:2023cv00972
Plaintiff:
Paul Niles
Defendant:
Dainel F. Mattucello, Ernest J. Lowerre, Sgt. Peirce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. USA
as 4:2023cv00627
Petitioner:
Shalamar J. Wade
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 7:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Blankenship, T. Norvell, C.A. Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Norvell, C.A. Dye, Lt. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown Sr. v. Wade et al
as 6:2022cv01149
Plaintiff:
Carlos Dewayne Brown and Carlos Dewayne Brown Sr.
Defendant:
J. Wade, FNU Parker, FNU Williker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. McMahan et al
as 4:2020cv04004
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Thompson
Defendant:
Major J Wade, Captain J. McMahan, Assistant Warden J. Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Connors et al
as 5:2020ct03189
Defendant:
J. Wade, Director Inch, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Webster Douglas Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
