Cases 1 - 10 of 186
Wells v. Armstrong et al
as 5:2025cv00066
Plaintiff:
Eugene Calvin Wells
Defendant:
J. Armstrong, V. Dankwa, J. Joliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Justin Weller, et al v. City of Urbana, OH, et al
as 25-3031
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN T. WELLER and TOMORROW HOLDINGS, LLC, dba Urbana Tomorrow, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF URBANA, OH, c/o Robert W. Bean, Mayor of City of Urbana, ROBERT W. BEAN, In his Individual and Official Capacity (Mayor of City of Urbana), AUDRA M. BEAN, In her Individual and Official Capacity, At Larg Member of Urbana City Council and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06311
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Carl Armstrong v. John Doe
as 24-1742
Plaintiff:
CARL J. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Unknown Parties
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1656
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jerome Curry v. MacDougall Corr. Inst
as 24-6692
Defendant:
CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME CURRY
Witt v. Stefonski
as 24-1657
Plaintiff:
WENDY WITT
Defendant:
DARRYL STEFONSKI, c/o Stonington Police Department, RYAN J. ARMSTRONG, Officer, c/o Stonington Police Department, POWELL, Officer, c/o Stonington Police Department and others
Addison v. Armstrong
as 2:2024cv03623
Plaintiff:
Jerome Addison
Defendant:
Julie J. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Doe
as 2:2024cv11555
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Carl J. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 1:2024cv00617
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Plaintiff:
Carl J. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
