Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Latwahn McElroy v. Maureen McLean, et al
as 20-16586
Defendant / Appellee:
MAUREEN MCLEAN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. SAYRE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Latwahn McElroy v. USDC-CAOAK
as 20-72378
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LATWAHN MCELROY, M. SAYRE, MAUREEN MCLEAN and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Petitioner:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Kenneth Griffin v. J. Clark Kelso, et al

as 20-15841
Defendant:
SEPULVEDA, Dr., A. MASURET, J. CLARK KELSO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH A. GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SAHOTA, Dr., J. BAL, A. NANGALAMA, Dr. and others
McElroy v. McLean et al

as 4:2020cv01900
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, J. Bal, Maureen McLean and others
Plaintiff:
Latwahn J. McElroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Coston v. Andrew Nangalama, et al

as 19-16450
Defendant:
TROY BRIMHALL, J. BAL, D. BERCHTOLD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD HALE, Licensed Vocational Nurse and ANDREW NANGALAMA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL M. COSTON
Bruce Phillippi, II v. J. Kelso, et al
as 17-16667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE PHILLIPPI II
Defendant - Appellee:
J. CLARK KELSO, J. BAL, MAUREEN MCLEAN and others
Thornberry v. Kernan et al

as 2:2017cv00953
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Thornberry
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, J. Bal, David Baugham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simental v. Adams et al

as 3:2017cv00801
Plaintiff:
Rudy Simental
Defendant:
N. Adams, M. Sayre, J. Bal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Hampton v. M. Ha et al

as 2:2016cv05542
Defendant:
J. Bal, P. Finander, M. Ha and others
Plaintiff:
James Hampton
Gray v. Lewis et al

as 1:2016cv00970
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gray
Defendant:
J. Lewis, J. Bal and M. McLean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.