Cases 1 - 10 of 649
Fishbourne v. Stirling et al
as 8:2025cv01412
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Fishbourne
Defendant:
B. Stirling, W Davis, F Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Papali v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2025cv01184
Plaintiff:
Alexis Papali
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Special Agent Ryan Long, Special Agent Michael Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Ningbo Kaabo Technology Co., LTD et al
as 3:2025cv00053
Plaintiff:
Mahlon J. Jackson
Defendant:
Ningbo Kaabo Technology Co., LTD and Voro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jackson v. Stephens et al
as 1:2025cv00059
Plaintiff:
Kennon J Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Zena Stephens, Jefferson County Correctional Facility Staff, Z. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS
as 2:2025cv00062
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION, DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eblen v. Lee et al
as 3:2025cv00020
Plaintiff:
William P Eblen
Defendant:
William Lee, David Rausch, Brandon Watwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Winborn v. Leeds, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01823
Defendant:
J Jackson, Butterbrodt, Kavli and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Winborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Albonico, et al.
as 24-7528
Defendant:
D. COX, CRADDOCK, N. ALBONICO and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ARNOLD RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
