Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Murillo v. Cota et al
as 3:2025cv00574
Plaintiff:
Mona S. Murillo
Defendant:
Jonathan P. Cota, Jessi Lewis, Marcus Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Kelly v. Newsom et al
as 1:2025cv00204
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom, Pat Horn and J. Moeckly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murillo v. Smith et al
as 4:2025cv00230
Defendant:
Stephen Smith, Barneberg, J. Moeckly and others
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Daniel Murillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Adkins v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv03794
Defendant:
D. Potts, J. Schultz, H. Moseley and others
Plaintiff:
DuPree Lamont Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCright v. Andes et al
as 5:2024cv08695
Defendant:
R. Hammond, Warden Chance Andes, E. Weaver and others
Plaintiff:
Colvin McCright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Baker v. Shirely et al
as 1:2024cv01442
Defendant:
J. Moeckly, Scott DeGough, Administrator EPA California and others
Plaintiff:
Millard Wayne Baker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushdan v. Davis, et al.
as 24-6961
Defendant:
I. CUMMINGS, D. DAVIS, CSP Solano, J. MOECKLY, CDCR and others
Plaintiff:
SALADIN RUSHDAN
Calvin Maron Robinson v. S. Gates et al
as 2:2024cv09590
Defendant:
D. Sumule, S. Gates, M. Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Maron Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Gates et al
as 5:2024cv07412
Defendant:
C. Zapatra, S. Gates, E. Burla and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Maron Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Tumacder et al
as 3:2024cv06675
Defendant:
Sean Tumacder, J. Moeckly and Jeff Macomber
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
