Cases 1 - 10 of 2,972
Barnes v. Annucci
as 25-921
Defendant:
B. FLEURY, DONALD G. UHLER, Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility, PAUL P. WOODRUFF, Deputy Superintendent of Security Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JESSIE J. BARNES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv04107
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. City of Montgomery, Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2025cv00286
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olupitan v. The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, et al
as 25-6055
Plaintiff:
MARTINA O. OLUPITAN, MHA
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL. THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA, MICHAEL J. SMITH, Pharm.D., GARY RASKOB, PhD and others
Samuel-Siegel et al v. Smith
as 1:2025cv01175
Plaintiff:
Yehonatan Samuel-Siegel and Margaret Samuel-Siegel
Defendant:
David J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2025cv00156
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Defendant:
WENDELL A SMITH and LEONA J SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Smith v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2025cv00162
Plaintiff:
Erica J Smith
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Thomas Building Manager RSA Union (MAG+)
as 2:2025cv00249
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Thomas Building Manager RSA Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Subway #27739-0 et al
as 2:2025cv00250
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Subway #27739-0, Nikki and Jimmy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. WARDEN
as 1:2025cv00622
Petitioner:
EDWARD J. SMITH
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
