Cases 1 - 10 of 40
In re: Christopher Cottle
as 25-2062
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER COTTLE
Respondent:
J. TERRA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
HEAGY v. TERRA et al
as 2:2025cv02672
Plaintiff:
TYLER T. HEAGY
Defendant:
J. TERRA, C. HENSLEY, JOHN MUICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Gabriel Rosa-Diaz
as 25-1879
Petitioner:
In re: GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, Executive Deputy Secretary for Institution Operations, LAUREL HARRY, Secretary of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, J. TERRA, Facility Manager and others
HOUSER v. TERRA et al
as 2:2025cv01875
Plaintiff:
DARIEN HOUSER
Defendant:
SUPT. J. TERRA, ANTHONY LETIZIO, DEPUTY SIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zachary Blair v. J. Terra, et al
as 25-1680
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BLAIR
Defendant:
J. TERRA, Superintendent of SCI Phoenix and WELLPATH INCORPORATION
COTTLE v. TERRA et al
as 2:2025cv01472
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER COTTLE
Respondent:
J. TERRA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Jones v. Harry, et al
as 25-1387
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Defendant:
CERT, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, HARRY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, KERI MOORE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS and others
Blair v. Terra et al
as 1:2024cv02248
Plaintiff:
Zachary Blair
Defendant:
Wellpath Incorporation and J. Terra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA-DIAZ v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2024cv06694
Defendant:
K. SHARTZER, M. WENEROWICZ, K. MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv05692
Defendant:
J. TERRA, DR HARRY and C.E.R.T.
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
