Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Moore v. Hughes et al
as 4:2024cv04063
Plaintiff:
Robbie J Moore
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Tyrone Baker, Wesly Christopherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Jamie Key
Defendant:
J. B. Pritzker, Rob Jefferys, A. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Dodd et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Vincent M George, Jr.
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd, William Loy, Robert Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hydron v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04002
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hydron
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv04069
Plaintiff:
Gregory Haynes
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Northern District of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv03856
Petitioner:
Jerome R. Johnson
Respondent:
Northern District of Illinois and J. B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv03744
Plaintiff:
Jerome R. Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Deanna Brookhart, Latoya Bayler and J. B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
