Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Arnett v. Griffis et al
as 7:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
William L Arnett
Defendant:
Mike Griffith, Officer Doe #1, Guard Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Louis Peets v. Jerry Brown, Jr., et al
as 23-15811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions and others
Louis Peets v. Jerry Brown, Jr., et al
as 23-15101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions and others
Helvy v. Paramo et al
as 3:2020cv01144
Defendant:
J. Dominguez, M. Voong, G. Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Wayne Helvy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC)Myers v. Kaihe et al
as 2:2020cv00764
Defendant:
S. Gonzalez, Colley, R. Kaihe and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ruiz v. Leon et al
as 2:2019cv02201
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, D. Leon, J. Dominguez and others
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holestine v. Covello et al
as 3:2019cv01593
Defendant:
D. Coon, J. Medina, F. Armenta and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Kelly Holestine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Thomas v. Fry et al
as 2:2019cv01041
Defendant:
M. Voong, J.C. Fry, J. Dominguez and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ortiz v. Hill et al
as 2:2019cv00583
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Rick Hill, M. Voong and others
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Ortiz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregorio Ortiz Jr. v. Rick Hill et al
as 2:2019cv02007
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Rick Hill, M. Voong and others
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Ortiz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
