Cases 11 - 20 of 21
David Meyers v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6674
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN IVAN GILMORE, Chief Warden, COUNSELOR R. BRITT, ANGELA WETHINGTON, Operations Manager/PREA Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Warden I. Hamilton
as 21-6660
Defendant / Appellee:
TONYA FOREMAN, DR. ULEP, TINYA FOREMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
(PC) Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, L Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Spencer et al
as 2:2021cv00009
Defendant:
E.P. Witt, L. Mabrey, Dr. Eric Van Buskirk and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Lipsey v. Young, et al,
as 2:2020cv02071
Plaintiff:
Fancy Moore Lipsey and Anthony Lamar Lipsey, II
Defendant:
W. Schichner, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Feltner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2020cv06483
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, R C Younger and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Joseph Walters, QMHP - Ms. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Green v. Chamberlain et al
as 2:2019cv00109
Defendant:
Lori Stein, D. Conlon, J. Lizarraga and others
Plaintiff:
Vencil C. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vandervall v. Feltner et al
as 2:2009cv01576
Plaintiff:
Karl Vandervall
Defendant:
J Feltner, G. Machado, H. Lackner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
