Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Easterling v. Jones et al
as 1:2020cv00182
Defendant:
William J. Jones and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cleve Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv
Jones v. USA
as 6:2015cv00214
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bobby J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Jones et al
as 6:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Gloria J. Jones, Unknown Spouse of Gloria J. Jones and Midland Funding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Brown et al v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 2:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kenny Brown , Steve Arlinghaus , Phyllis Sparks and others
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky , The Kentucky State Board of Elections and Kentucky Legislative Research Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. USA
as 6:2013cv07258
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bobby J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Jones et al
as 3:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Howard Lee Jones and Pamela J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Simpson v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv00422
Petitioner:
Charles L. Simpson
Respondent:
J. Jones and Woodford Co. Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lucas v. Kentucky State Prison Officials et al
as 3:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Lucas
Defendant:
Kentucky State Prison Officials, Philip Parker, Victoria Lynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
Clarence A. Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center, J. Jones, Chad Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Williamson et al
as 6:2008cv00403
Petitioner:
Darrell James Parks
Respondent:
Troy Williamson, S Scott, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
