Cases 1 - 10 of 476
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2365
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2358
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Stephens v. Montejo, et al.
as 24-2291
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE EARL STEPHENS, also known as Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
E. MONTEJO, Doctor, J. G. STUMPF, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Howard v. Grierson, et al.
as 24-851
Plaintiff:
REGINALD C. HOWARD
Defendant:
STEVEN D. GRIERSON, TERI BERKSHIRE, KRISTEN BROWN and others
Martin v. Fox, et al.
as 23-3684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
O. Z. MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT FOX, Warden, JOSEPH BICK, Medical Doctor, OGNJEN PETRAS, Physician Surgeon and others
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023at00854
Plaintiff:
Gary J. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
Gary J. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brandon Williams v. Robert H. Rexrode et al
as 2:2023cv05894
Plaintiff:
Brandon Williams
Defendant:
Robert H. Rexrode, Anthony J. Lewis and Brandon M. Stoffers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Robey v. Seattle Municipal Corporation, et al
as 23-35232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROBEY, We the People
Defendant / Appellee:
SEATTLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AKA City of Seattle, BRUCE HARRELL, Seattle Mayor, WSBA #17173, PAUL PURCELL, Seattle Housing Authority and others
Robey v. Seattle Municipal Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
William Robey
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Seattle Municipal Corporation, Bruce Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
