Cases 1 - 10 of 767
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2365
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2358
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Stephens v. Montejo, et al.
as 24-2291
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE EARL STEPHENS, also known as Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
E. MONTEJO, Doctor, J. G. STUMPF, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Grierson, et al.
as 24-851
Plaintiff:
REGINALD C. HOWARD
Defendant:
STEVEN D. GRIERSON, TERI BERKSHIRE, KRISTEN BROWN and others
Eugene Lewis, Jr. v. Hector Ochoa
as 24-1016
Plaintiff:
EUGENE J. LEWIS, JR.
Defendant:
HECTOR OCHOA, Officer
Martin v. Fox, et al.
as 23-3684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
O. Z. MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT FOX, Warden, JOSEPH BICK, Medical Doctor, OGNJEN PETRAS, Physician Surgeon and others
Lewis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
David J. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Jared Rardin, Dr. Elaine York and A. Herzog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS) Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
Gary J. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Deborah Cooney v. Molly Dwyer, et al
as 23-15236
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBORAH COONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MOLLY C. DWYER, Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Individually and in Her Official Capacity, SUSAN Y. SOONG, Clerk of Court, Office of the Clerk, United States District Court, Individually and in Her Official Capacity, LYNMOORE AT LAWNWOOD ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
