Cases 1 - 9 of 9
(PC) Sherman v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2019cv00569
Defendant:
A. Krouse, K. J. Allen, J. Lyman and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Glenn Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LYMAN III v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv12420
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. LYMAN, III
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CUSTOMER LOGISTICS SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyman III v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as ILN/1:18-cv-02123
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Lyman III
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Customer Logistics Services, LLC and others
Lyman III v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv02123
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Lyman III
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Customer Logistics Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyman et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2018cv10327
Plaintiff:
Richard J Lyman , William F Weld and Robert D Capodilupo
Defendant:
Charles D Baker and William Francis Galvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Merriman v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2017cv01701
Plaintiff:
Dominique Merriman
Defendant:
J. Lizarraga, James Telander, Worrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francini v. East Haddam et al
as 3:2016cv01568
Plaintiff:
William Francini
Defendant:
Town of East Haddam , East Haddam Planning and Zoning Commission , Emmett J. Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyman v. Urquidez
as 2:2015cv00659
Plaintiff:
Ernest J Lyman
Defendant:
Donna Marie Urquidez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyman v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01255
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Lyman
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
