Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MEYER et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02070
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE PORTER, DIONNE REISERT, SHARON L. REITER and others
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyer et al v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01243
Plaintiff:
Annette Porter, Dionne Reisert, Sharon L. Reiter and others
Defendant:
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raines v. U.S. Government
as 2:2018cv01105
Plaintiff:
John J. Raines
Defendant:
U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAINES v. THE MIDDLE GEORGIA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC
as 5:2017cv00454
Plaintiff:
YOMANDERY J RAINES
Defendant:
THE MIDDLE GEORGIA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617
Rains v. Patel et al
as 3:2016cv00304
Plaintiff:
Connie J Rains
Defendant:
Ishawar Patel and Harry Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Raines v. Easley, City of et al
as 8:2015cv05093
Plaintiff:
Johnnelle J Raines
Defendant:
Easley, City of , Easley Police Department , Tim Tollison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raines v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv05781
Plaintiff:
Mary J. Raines
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oliver v. Earl et al
as 1:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Christopher Earl, J. Raines, Larry Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
