Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam v. Glenn E. Pratt et al
as 5:2024cv01905
Defendant:
Fernando Franco, R. Rusow, J. Thorpe and others
Plaintiff:
Rishard H. Amadi Salaam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dooley v. Sullivan County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Kevin P. Dooley
Defendant:
Sullivan County (Department of Corrections), Stanley Hannum, Christopher M. McBeigh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Aaron Thorpe
as 23-3055
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Aaron J. Thorpe
Christopher Thorpe v. Florida Department of Corrections Secretary
as 23-10842
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J. THORPE
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY
USA v. Aaron Thorpe
as 23-3027
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Aaron J. Thorpe
Ogle v. Cabelka et al
as 7:2021cv00129
Defendant:
Larry Cecil Cabelka, Jared Thorp Cabelka, Bonnie Sue King Cabelka and others
Plaintiff:
Receiver Robert E. Ogle and Robert E. Ogle
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THORPE v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2020cv00408
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER J. THORPE
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rhandall Thorpe, et al v. IRS, et al
as 19-1700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHANDALL J. THORPE and BARBARA J. THORPE
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, PHILLIP DUN, IRS Appeals Team Manager, DENISE MURRAY, Team Manager and others
USA v. Aaron Thorpe
as 19-3017
Defendant / Appellant:
Aaron J. Thorpe
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
In re: Richard J. Thorpe
as 2:2018rd00019
Plaintiff:
Richard J Thorpe
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
