Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Trent v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Terrance J. Trent
Defendant:
FNU Honeycutt, Chris Biecker, Jerry Laws and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRENT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv12935
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA J. TRENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00636
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Trent v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06713
Plaintiff:
Martha J. Trent
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bolden v. Chudy
as 4:2014cv03481
Plaintiff:
James Earl Bolden
Defendant:
Joseph Chudy and J. Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vincent Rucker v. J. Trent, et al
as 12-17325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT TYRONE RUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. TRENT, PR and M. SEPULVEDA, M.D.
LLOYD v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
GARY STEVEN LLOYD
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S HOSFORD, E WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Nicholas E Trent et al
as 8:2012cv01027
Defendant:
Citibank NA, Bonnie J Trent and Nicholas E Trent
Plaintiff:
United States of America
David Lancaster v. Aung, et al
as 12-16109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GENE LANCASTER
Defendant - Appellee:
AUNG, Dr., Z. AHMED, MD, G. KALLISHER and others
Macho v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2011cv05721
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Macho
Defendant:
J. Trent, M. Sepulveda, C. Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
