Cases 1 - 9 of 9
War Eagle Farms, LLC et al v. American Agri-Business Insurance Co. et al
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
War Eagle Farms, LLC doing business as Coldwater Planting Company, Kate's Hope, LLC doing business as Coldwater Planting Company, William Brennan Chapman and others
Defendant:
American Agri-Business Insurance Co., Agrisompo North America, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Winding v. Rutledge et al
as 3:2013cv00289
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
C. Rutledge, J. Breakfield, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00078
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Nigel McClain
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Huggins et al
as 3:2013cv00215
Defendant:
D. Huggins , M. Powe , R. Rice and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. MTC, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
MTC, Inc., H. Hollie, T. Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Hollie et al
as 4:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
H. Hollie, T. Naylor, M. Powe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding and Nigel McClain
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Breakfield et al
as 4:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
J. Breakfield, F. Ovalle, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
