Cases 1 - 10 of 442
M.B. v. United States of America, et. al.
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
M.B.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.C. Streeval, Dr. Kareem Wasim, PsyD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Bryant v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
J.C. Bryant, III
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Pulaski County Dentention Center, Pulaski County Dentention Center Medical Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merchant v. Philips et al
as 7:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Pedro Bobby Merchant
Defendant:
Officer C. Philips and Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Al-Shabazz v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Al-Shabazz v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pelko v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
John D Pelko
Respondent:
Sheriff J.C. Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tinch v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Tekoa Ouatrell Tinch
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sivak v. Fitzgerald et al
as 3:2023cv06256
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
Lisa Fitzgerald, Bridget S. Bade, Kenneth K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00771
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Franklin
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval and D.O.J. (FBOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dickey v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Douglas Dickey
Defendant:
Sheriff J.C. Hooper and Nueces County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
