Cases 1 - 10 of 106
M.B. v. United States of America, et. al.
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
M.B.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.C. Streeval, Dr. Kareem Wasim, PsyD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Russell Standard NC, LLC v. J.C. Joyce Trucking & Paving Co., Inc.
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Russell Standard NC, LLC
Defendant:
J.C. Joyce Trucking & Paving Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Merchant v. Philips et al
as 7:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Pedro Bobby Merchant
Defendant:
Officer C. Philips and Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Al-Shabazz v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Al-Shabazz v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tinch v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Tekoa Ouatrell Tinch
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Franklin v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00771
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Franklin
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval and D.O.J. (FBOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bacon v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00613
Petitioner:
Michael A. Bacon
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ryland v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s) et al
as 7:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Corey R Ryland
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s), North Central Regional Director, J.C. Streeval and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
