Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rhodes v. Ohta et al
as 4:2016cv06805
Plaintiff:
Kavin Maurice Rhodes
Defendant:
Sam Ohta, Peter Swarth, Antonio Bestard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt et al v. Range Resources-Appalachia, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00046
Plaintiff:
William C Hunt , Susan L Hunt and Willow Springs, Inc.
Defendant:
Range Resources-Appalachia, LLC , Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC , J.D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHOOLEY v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
as 2:2014cv00515
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL SCHOOLEY
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J.D. SMITH, BRIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schooley v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00224
Plaintiff:
Russell Schooley
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, J.D. Smith, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schooley v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv02929
Plaintiff:
Russell Schooley
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, J.D. Smith, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv00450
Plaintiff:
J.D. Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith et al v. DePuy International Limited et al
as 1:2011dp21218
Plaintiff:
Juanita M Smith and J.D. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dewbre v. Thomas et al
as 4:2009cv01364
Plaintiff:
Marshall Alan Dewbre
Defendant:
Thommy Thomas, Billingsly, Coons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills et al v. Head Doctor Carabello et al
as 1:2009cv01674
Plaintiff:
M. Mills, Derrick S. Williams and J.D. Smith
Defendant:
Head Doctor Carabello, Mark A. Hughes and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
