Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Koehl v Jack In The Box Inc
as 6:2025cv00074
Plaintiff:
Margaret Koehl
Defendant:
Jack In The Box Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DeLaCruz-Bancroft v. Field Nation, et al
as 24-2169
Defendant:
SPARTAN COMPUTER SERVICES/NATIONAL SERVICE CENTER, AKA SCS/NSC, FIELD NATION, LLC, JACK IN THE BOX, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD DELACRUZ-BANCROFT
S3G Technology LLC v. Jack in the Box, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00652
Defendant:
Jack in the Box, Inc.
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Jack in the Box Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00093
Defendant:
Jack in the Box Inc. and Different Rules, LLC
Plaintiff:
Fall Line Patents, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Pemberton v. Jack in the Box Inc.
as 3:2024cv01179
Defendant:
Jack in the Box Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kirk Pemberton
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Jack In the Box Inc
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Jack In the Box Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35593
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DeLaCruz-Bancroft v. Field Nation, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Howard DeLaCruz-Bancroft
Defendant:
Field Nation, LLC, Spartan Computer Services/National Service Center, SCS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
