Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Banks v. McGlynn, Hays & Co., Inc.
as 24-895
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BANKS
Defendant:
MCGLYNN, HAYS & CO., INC., GERARD CARLUCCI, Individually, JOSEPH I. CRINCOLI, Individually and others
Banks v. McGlynn, Hays & Co., Inc.
as 24-585
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BANKS
Defendant:
MCGLYNN, HAYS & CO., INC., Individually and Jointly, GERARD CARLUCCI, JACK ROBINSON and others
McDonald v. Brown et al
as 5:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. McDonald
Defendant:
Kimbel L. Brown, Jack Robinson, Wilbur & Myrna George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClure v. Texas Attorney General
as 22-50025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Troy McClure
Defendant / Appellee:
Heather Keller, Comal county District court clerk, Jack Robinson, presiding judge of the 207th District court, Comal county, Jennifer Tharp, Comal county District attorney and others
Hickman v. Q Carriers, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hickman
Defendant:
Jack Robinson and Q Carriers, Inc.
Intervenor:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00679
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McClure v. Paxton et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Michael Miller, Jennifer Tharp, John #4 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLURE v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2019cv01456
Defendant:
Jennifer Tharp, Jessi Valdez, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert T. McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClure v. Paxton et al
as 5:2019cv00826
Defendant:
Michael Miller, Jennifer Tharp, John Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05727
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
