Cases 1 - 10 of 25
FRANCIS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
ADDISA JAHRUSALEM FRANCIS, JACQUELINE DENNIS and HENRY FRANCIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Francis v. US
as 23-2142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADDISA JAHRUSALEM FRANCIS, aka Jacqueline Dennis, aka Henry Francis
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
FRANCIS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
ADDISA JAHRUSALEM FRANCIS, JACQUELINE DENNIS and HENRY FRANCIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Denny v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Denny
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Addisa Jahrusalem Francis v. USA, et al
as 22-14194
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACQUELINE DENNIS and ADDISA JAHRUSALEM FRANCIS, a.k.a. Jacqueline Dennis
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J. TRUMP, SPEAKER OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Francis v. United States of America et al
as 8:2022cv02009
Petitioner:
Addisa Jahrusalem Francis and Jacqueline Dennis
Respondent:
United States of America, Donald J. Trump, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TDC Specialty Insurance Company v. Louisiana Health Care Consultants, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02455
Plaintiff:
TDC Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Louisiana Health Care Consultants, LLC, Bob G Dean, Jr, Bob Dean Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
FrancisIn re: Francis
as 22-151
Petitioner:
In re: ADDISA JAHRUSALEM FRANCIS, aka Jacqueline Dennis
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Francis v. US
as 22-1188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADDISA JAHRUSALEM FRANCIS, aka Jacqueline Dennis
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
FrancisIn re: Francis
as 21-184
Petitioner:
In re: ADDISA JAHRUSALEM FRANCIS, aka Jacqueline Dennis
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
