Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Eubanks v. Nelson
as 23-10936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Travis Wayne Eubanks, a voter of Bexar County, Texas, Travis Eubanks, a voter of Bexar County, Texas, Kyle Strongin, a voter of Hood County, Texas and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jane Nelson, Texas Secretary of State, John B. Scott, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as the Texas Secretary of State, Jose "Joe" A. Esparza, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of State and others
Appellant:
Anne Stone and Allyson Raskin
Couchman et al v. Callanen et al
as 5:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Heather Couchman, Rodney Landry, Jarrett Woodward and others
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Callanen, Nelson Wolff, Justin Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Strongin et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Kyle Strongin, Lindsey Gremont, Christine Koepke and others
Defendant:
John B. Scott, Jose "Joe" A. Esparza, Secretary of State of Texas and others
Not Classified By Court:
Honorable Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LULAC Texas et al v. Esparza et al
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
Lulac Texas, Vote Latino, Texas Alliance for Retired Americans and others
Defendant:
Jose Esparza, Ken Paxton, Jacquelyn Callanen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
VOTE.ORG v. CALLANEN et al
as 5:2021cv00649
Plaintiff:
VOTE.ORG
Defendant:
JACQUELYN CALLANEN, BRUCE ELFANT, REMI GARZA and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Intervenor:
Lupe C. Torres and Terrie Pendley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Texas State LULAC et al v. Elfant et al
as 1:2021cv00546
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Callanen, Bruce Elfant, Isabel Longoria and others
Plaintiff:
Texas State LULAC and Voto Latino
Petitioner:
Lupe C. Torres, Terrie Pendley and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
