Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Omar Ewideh, et al v. Homesite Insurance Co, et al
as 24-2690
Defendant:
WARDLAW CLAIMS, AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE CO, JAMES J. WALSH and others
Plaintiff:
NIVERTITI GEAITH and OMAR EWIDEH
Ewideh et al v. Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest et al
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Omar Ewideh and Nivertiti Geaith
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company of The Midwest, American Family Insurance, AFICS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
EWIDEH et al v. HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST et al
as 2:2023cv02590
Plaintiff:
OMAR EWIDEH and NIVERTITI GEAITH
Defendant:
HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, AMERICAN FIRE INSURANCE, AFICS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Madison Cawthorn v. Barbara Lynn Amalfi
as 22-1251
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MADISON CAWTHORN
Appellant:
BARBARA LYNN AMALFI, LAUREL ASHTON, NATALIE BARNES and others
Defendant:
DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROFESSOR DEREK T. MULLER, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER and NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY
Cawthorn v. Circosta et al
as 5:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Madison Cawthorn
Defendant:
DAMON CIRCOSTA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE NC BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JEFF CARMON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Interested Party:
Barbara Lynn Amalfi, Laurel Ashton, Natalie Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
