Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Workman v. LHC Group, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00048
Plaintiff: James Edward Workman
Defendant: LHC Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Elliott v. John Crane, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00072
Plaintiff: James E Elliott and James Edward Elliott
Defendant: John Crane, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Inc., Albany International Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Carter v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv01036
Petitioner: James Edward Carter
Respondent: Melvin Johnson, Wayne Handley and Heather Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Switkay v. Arata Expositions
as 1:2021cv00727
Defendant: Arata Expositions and James Edward Watson
Plaintiff: Nancy Switkay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yates v. Bates et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00718
Defendant: County of Alleghany, Robert Bates and Sheriff Hall
Plaintiff: James Edward Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2019cv01033
Defendant: Nurse Townsend, Correct Care Solutions and Doctor Mereno
Plaintiff: James Edward Andrews, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Deputy Bacon et al
as 1:2018cv01198
Defendant: Investigator J. La Vecchia, Deputy Bacon, Major Johnson and others
Plaintiff: James Edward Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv00144
Plaintiff: James Edward Moore
Defendant: Curtiss-Wright Corporation , Dana Companies, LLC , Eaton Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McEachern v. Hamilton
as 2:2017cv00513
Petitioner: James Edward McEachern
Respondent: Warden Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?