Cases 1 - 9 of 9
KNIGHT v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv00807
Defendant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNIGHT v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv04576
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JOSEPH C. KERSZNIAK and GOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. WARREN et al
as 1:2012cv07670
Petitioner:
JAMES KNIGHT
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JEFFERY S. CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KNIGHT v. HOLMAN et al
as 1:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLMAN and PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUMPHREY v. MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2011cv03243
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT PUMPHREY
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, EDWARD BELMONT and CHARLES ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2009cv02222
Petitioner:
James Knight
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROGERS et al v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv62700
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT ROGERS, JAMES KNIGHT ROGERS, JAMES KNIGHT ROGERS and others
Defendant:
BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY and ATCHINSIN TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PUMPHREY v. PEREKSTA et al
as 3:2008cv05679
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT PUMPHREY
Defendant:
DARLENE J. PEREKSTA, J.S.C, EDWARD A. BELMONT, A. GARCIA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PUMPHREY v. MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
as 3:2008cv05680
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT PUMPHREY
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
