Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MATTINGLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16886
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTINGLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MATTINGLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16605
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTINGLY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mattingly v. Sazerac Distillers, LLC
as 3:2021cv00216
Defendant:
Sazerac Distillers, LLC
Plaintiff:
James Mattingly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mattingly v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01225
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
James Mattingly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MATTINGLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv20856
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTINGLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03072
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO AVILA, JACOB ZIMMERMAN, JOSHUA THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02057
Plaintiff:
Francisco Avila, Jacob Zimmerman, Joshua Thompson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mattingly et al v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv08437
Plaintiff:
Amanda Mattingly and James Mattingly
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation and Mentor Worldwide LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mattingly et al v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv00414
Plaintiff:
Amanda Mattingly and James Mattingly
Defendant:
MENTOR CORPORATION and MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mattingly et al v. Mentor Corporation et al
as MN/0:13-cv-02252
Plaintiff:
Amanda Mattingly and James Mattingly
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation and Mentor Worldwide, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
