Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Prymas Vaz v. James McHenry, et al
as 21-15913
Defendant / Appellee:
JILL L. ANDERSON, in her Official Capacity as General Counsel for the Executive Office for Immigration Review and JAMES MCHENRY, in his official capacity, Director of Executive Office for Immigration Review
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRYMAS NAZRETH VAZ
Centro Legal de la Raza et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review et al
as 3:2021cv00463
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff:
Tahirih Justice Center, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, Centro Legal de la Raza and others
Amicus Curiae:
Alameda County Public Defender's Office, University of California, Los Angeles Immigration Law Clinic, Former Immigration Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pangea Legal Services, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17490
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., DOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Immigration Equality et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09258
Plaintiff:
Black LGBTQIA Migrant Project, Immigration Equality, The Translatin@ Coalition and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
AIDS United, Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09253
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Amicus Curiae:
Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense, Immigration Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02608
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Concely Mendez Rojas, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-35988
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY H. PHAM, Acting Director of United States Customs and Immigration Services, in his official capacity, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELMER GEOVANNI RODRIGUEZ ESCOBAR, LIDIA MARGARITA LOPEZ ORELLANA, CONCELY DEL CARMEN MENDEZ ROJAS and others
Claimant:
ENAMUL HAQE CHOWDHURY
J.S.M, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-17204
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Acting Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
J. S. M., et al
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv07721
Defendant:
Mark A Morgan, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham and others
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Legal Services Organizations and Immigration Law Professors
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
