Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Space Exploration Technologies Corp v. Bell et al
as 1:2023cv00137
Plaintiff: Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, SpaceX and Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Defendant: Carol Bell, in her official capacity as Administrative Law Judge of the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, James McHenry, in his official capacity as Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Walmart Inc. v. King et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00040
Plaintiff: Walmart Inc.
Defendant: Jean King, James Mchenry, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
McHenry et al v. FCA US LLC
as 3:2023cv00479
Plaintiff: James McHenry and Juanita McHenry
Defendant: FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mitchell v. Mayorkas
as 21-2987
Petitioner / Appellant: O'Neil Damion Mitchell
Respondent / Appellee: Alejandro N. Mayorkas, James McHenry, Thomas Feeley and others
Prymas Vaz v. James McHenry, et al
as 21-15913
Defendant / Appellee: JILL L. ANDERSON, in her Official Capacity as General Counsel for the Executive Office for Immigration Review and JAMES MCHENRY, in his official capacity, Director of Executive Office for Immigration Review
Plaintiff / Appellant: PRYMAS NAZRETH VAZ
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
P.L. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E
as 21-825
Plaintiff: J.C., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: R.F.J., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, P.L., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, A.Q., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Director Thomas R. Decker, Director of New York Field Office of ICE, in official capacity, Director Matthew Albence, Director Matthew T. Albence Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement Removal Operations, in official capacity, Daniel J. Daugherty and others
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-192
Respondent: United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner: Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Centro Legal de la Raza et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00463
Defendant: Jeffrey A. Rosen, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff: Tahirih Justice Center, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, Centro Legal de la Raza and others
Amicus Curiae: Alameda County Public Defender's Office, University of California, Los Angeles Immigration Law Clinic, Former Immigration Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Valez-Chavez v. McHenry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00296
Defendant: Director James McHenry, Immigration Judge Charles R Conroy, Acting Attorney Gen Jeffrey A. Rosen and others
Plaintiff: Jorge Luis Valez-Chavez
Amicus Curiae: The Legal Aid Society
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?