Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00163
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARKE v. HALL et al
as 2:2011cv03218
Plaintiff: JAMES CLARKE
Defendant: COLEMAN HALL , CHARLES IRIZARRY , BARRY HAZZARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. HALL et al
as 2:2011cv03220
Plaintiff: RICHARD TAYLOR
Defendant: COLEMAN HALL , PATRICIA JACKSON and JAMES NEWTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Newton Crunkleton v. 3m, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-74388
Plaintiff: James Newton Crunkleton
Defendant: 3m
RAWLS V. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
as 2:2008mc00127
Plaintiff: WILLIAM RAWLS
Defendant: THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, RICK ZERAMBO, KARREN GLADDNEY and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type: Other Statutes None
NEWTON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2008cv00305
Plaintiff: JAMES NEWTON
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CRUNKLETON v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74388
Plaintiff: JAMES NEWTON CRUNKLETON
Defendant: 3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv06762
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01026
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Beede v. Quarterman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-20336
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES NEWTON BEEDE
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?