Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rybczyk v. Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01506
Plaintiff:
Jayne Rybczyk
Defendant:
Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, Susan B Washer, William Aliski and others
Osman v. Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09707
Plaintiff:
Rauf Osman
Defendant:
Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, Bill Aliski, Yehia Hashad and others
Keller v. Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09615
Plaintiff:
Sholom Keller
Defendant:
Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, William Aliski, Yehia Hashad and others
Plumley v. Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01470
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Defendant:
Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, Susan B. Washer, William Aliski and others
Sabatini v. Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09529
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, Susan B. Washer, William Aliski and others
Simona v. Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09402
Plaintiff:
Pavanello Simona
Defendant:
Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, Bill Aliski, Yehia Hashad and others
GREEN et al v. ROSEN et al
as 2:2019cv01192
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GREEN and GWENDOLYN GREEN
Defendant:
OURISMAN IMPORTS, INC. and JAMES ROSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lifecore Fitness, Inc. v. Fitness Blowout, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01828
Plaintiff:
Lifecore Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
Fitness Blowout, Inc., James Rosen and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Glenn Henderson v. David Mckenzie
as 14-2269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID LOAR MCKENZIE, SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT, KIM RUSSO and others
Glenn Henderson v. Town of Hope Mill
as 14-2044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF HOPE MILLS, OTIS WRIGHT, JAMES ROSEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
