Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Lowe, et al v. Lambrew, et al
as 24-1283
Plaintiff: ALICIA LOWE, DEBRA CHALMERS, JENNIFER BARBALIAS and others
Defendant: JEANNE LAMBREW, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, PUTHIERY VA, JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Maine and others
Interested Party: MTM ACQUISITION, INC., d/b/a Portland Press Herald, /Maine Sunday Telegram, Kennebec Journal, and Morning Sentinel and SJ ACQUISITION, INC., d/b/a Sun Journal
Hafner v. Mills, et al
as 24-1137
Plaintiff: ERIC HAFNER
Defendant: JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Maine Governor, AARON M. FREY, in his official capacity as Maine Attorney General, SHENNA BELLOWS, in her official capacity as Maine Secretary of State and others
HAFNER v. MILLS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff: ERIC HAFNER
Defendant: JANET T MILLS, AARON FREY, SHENNA BELLOWS and others
Not Yet Classified: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abadi v. WalMart Inc, et al
as 22-1901
Plaintiff / Appellant: AARON ABADI
Defendant / Appellee: WAL-MART STORES INC., WALMART STORES EAST LP, JANET T. MILLS and others
ABADI v. WALMART INC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff: AARON ABADI
Defendant: WALMART INC, WAL-MART STORES EAST LP, JANET T MILLS and others
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Does, et al v. Mills, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1435
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN DOES, 1-3, JACK DOES, 1-1000, JANE DOES, 1-6 and others
Defendant / Appellee: JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Maine, JEANNE LAMBREW, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, NIRAV D. SHAH, in his official capacity as Director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention and others
Interested Party: MTM ACQUISITION, INC. and SJ ACQUISITION, INC.
Intervenor: MTM ACQUISITION, INC., d/b/a Portland Press Herald, /Maine Sunday Telegram, Kennebec Journal, and Morning Sentinel and SJ ACQUISITION, INC., d/b/a Sun Journal
Does, et al v. Mills, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1826
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN DOES, 1-3, JACK DOES, 1-1000, JANE DOES, 1-6 and others
Defendant / Appellee: JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Maine, JEANNE LAMBREW, NIRAV D. SHAH, in his official capacity as Director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention and others
Petitioner: AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MAINE and others
Amicus Curiae: GLOBAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE and METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCHES
JANE DOES 1-6 et al v. MILLS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00242
Plaintiff: JOHN DOES 1-3, JACK DOES 1-1000, JANE DOES 1-6 and others
Defendant: JANET T MILLS, JEANNE M LAMBREW, DR NIRAV D SHAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvary Chapel of Bangor v. Mills
as 21-1453
Interested Party: AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
Defendant / Appellee: JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Maine
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALVARY CHAPEL OF BANGOR
Sparks v. Mills, et al
as 21-1346
Defendant / Appellee: LAURA FORTMAN US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, in her official capacity as the Commissioner, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections, JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as the Governor of the State of Maine and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARC SPARKS, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?