Other Statutes Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 81
County of Alameda, California v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through County Counsel Donna Ziegler et al
as 3:2019cv02317
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, JONATHAN D. SACKLER, an individual and as trustee for TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF MEMBERS OF THE RAYMOND SACKLER FAMILY and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through County Counsel Donna Ziegler, County of Alameda, California
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
City of Westminster et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02325
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Westminster City Attorney Richard D. Jones, City of Westminster
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
City of Santa Ana et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv02324
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Santa Ana City Attorney Sonia R. Carvalho, CITY OF SANTA ANA
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
City of Irvine et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02323
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF IRVINE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Irvine City Attorney Jeffrey Melching, The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
City of Fullerton et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02321
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: city of fullerton, The People of the State of California, by and through Fullerton City Attorney Richard D. Jones, The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
City of El Monte et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv03588
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through El Monte City Attorney Rick Olivarez, City of El Monte, The People of The State of California
Petitioner: ALLERGAN FINANCE, LLC, F/K/A/ ACTAVIS, INC., F/K/A WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
County of Kern et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00557
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: County of Kern, The People of the State of California, People of the State of California and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
City of Costa Mesa et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02320
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: City of Costa Mesa, The People of the State of California
Not Yet Classified: California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY INDIAN HEALTH, INC. v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 5:2019cv00005
Defendant: H. D. Smith, LLC d/b/a HD Smith, f/k/a H. D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co., McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY INDIAN HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
The Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv07430
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: The Hoopa Valley Tribe
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?