Cases 1 - 6 of 6
In re Eastman Kodak Company Securities Litigation
as 22-2788
Plaintiff:
Tiandong Tang, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Margaretha Welkhammer, Jimmie A. McAdams, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Les Investissements Kiz Inc., Lead Plaintiff and UAT Trading Service, Inc., Lead Plaintiff
Defendant / Appellee:
Eastman Kodak Company, James V. Continenza, David Bullwinkle and others
Defendant:
George Karfunkel
Peters, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Eastman Kodak Company v. Continenza et al
as 6:2021cv06621
Plaintiff:
LOUIS PETERS, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY and Louis Peters
Defendant:
JAMES V. CONTINENZA, DAVID E. BULLWINKLE, ROGER W. BYRD and others
Petitioner:
Herbert Silverberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Eastman Kodak Company Securities Litigation
as 6:2021cv06418
Defendant:
David Bullwinkle, James V. Continenza, Eastman Kodak Company and others
Petitioner:
Broward Motorsports Holdings LLC, SRR Fortress Capital LLC, Daniel Yannes and others
Plaintiff:
Tiandong Tang and Margaretha Welkhammer
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jimmie A. McAdams, Judy P. McAdams and Herbert Silverberg
Consolidated Defendant:
George Karfunkel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Martin v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv05935
Defendant:
The City of New York, Jason New York City Police Officer Smith, Shield Number 16576 and NYC Police Officer Jason Smith
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
United States of America v. New et al
as 2:2010cv00388
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sandra New, Jason New, Kevin J. New and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
